You are here: Home >> The False Claims Act >> Common types of fraud >> Other types of fraud 


TopMenuCorner.jpg (642 bytes)

Home | Search our site | Contact us   

The False Claims Act  An online resource for whistleblowers about qui tam lawsuits and the False Claims Act. A service of Phillips & Cohen LLP, the nation's most successful and most experienced whistleblower law firm.

How it works | Common types of fraud | Qui tam statisticsThe statute
History of the law | State laws | Congressional testimony

Common types of fraud against the government
Other types of fraud      

Most qui tam cases involve Medicaid and Medicare fraud and defense contractor fraud. But fraud also occurs in other areas where the government spends hundreds of billions of dollars annually on goods and services.

Some of the areas where fraud might occur and be the basis of a False Claims Act case are:

Public works projects and federal government construction
The federal government spends billions on public works projects and construction of federal buildings. Fraudulent practices by contractors include bid-rigging, overcharging for contracts and failing to follow project specifications. All of those practices could be the basis of a False Claims Act lawsuit.

A construction company hired to build Army barracks recently settled a qui tam lawsuit that charged it did not follow contract plans and specifications, failed to report substantial construction defects and engaged in a cover-up to hide the problems.

Top of page

Research programs
The federal government provides grants for research on a wide variety of topics. Sometimes grant recipients use the funds to pay for salaries or expenses for another research project or other work then charge those costs off on the federal grant or inflate their costs for conducting research projects.

At academic medical centers, federal payments for research overhead, called indirect payments, total tens of millions of dollars a year. The government and the medical center determine a reasonable overhead rate for the hospital, then the government agrees to mark up each research grant by a fixed rate for the next year to cover incidental expenses. This usually includes items like heat and electricity bills and housekeeping for the part of the hospital used for the research, and sometimes even mortgage payments for lab buildings.

One of the largest qui tam settlements involving a research grant was against New York University Medical Center, which paid $15.5 million to the federal government. The government said the medical center provided a "false, inaccurate and incomplete picture" of its overhead costs for research projects. The center allegedly gave the government waste disposal bills that were already paid by other sources, inflated housekeeping bills and counted as overhead unrelated items, such as food for the medical school commencement dinner.

Top of page

Most goods imported into the U.S. are subject to customs duties. Companies that undervalue imports to lower the amount of customs duties they have to pay or who underpay customs duties through other fraudulent schemes are liable under the False Claims Act.

Environmental programs
The federal government spends substantial sums on programs to clean up hazardous and toxic waste. It also requires contractors to follow all environmental laws and regulations, such as the Clean Water Act. Any contractor that deliberately overcharges the government for hazardous and toxic waste clean-up, gets paid by the government for work that it doesn’t perform or whose service doesn’t meet government specifications would be liable under the False Claims Act.

In a recent case, an environmental testing firm settled a qui tam lawsuit that charged the firm had failed to properly test the level of hazardous substances in soil and water samples as required under contracts with the Army Corps of Engineers.

Top of page

Loan guarantees
The federal government has many loan guarantee programs, including loans for education, housing and small businesses. If the loan is not repaid and fraudulent misrepresentation was made to obtain these loan guarantees, then there might be a sufficient basis for a False Claims Act lawsuit.

A cosmetology school and its owners paid $2 million to settle a qui tam case alleging false statements and certifications that the vocational school met all statutory and regulatory requirements to participate in the Guaranteed Student Loan and Pell Grant programs. According to the lawsuit, the school falsified time cards, attendance records and academic records to make it appear as though students were attending classes and maintaining satisfactory progress to qualify for the federal financial assistance.

Top of page

Underpayment of royalties on government-leased land
Oil and gas production on federal and Indian lands are governed by lease agreements between the Interior Department and private companies. By law, the companies must pay the federal government and Indian tribes a percentage of the value of the oil and gas as a royalty. Companies also must pay royalties on any timber harvested or minerals such as coal mined from federal and Indian lands.

A qui tam lawsuit is pending against 14 major oil companies for knowingly undervaluing oil extracted from public and Indian lands to reduce the royalties they had to pay. The oil was taken from the Gulf of Mexico and western states.

Agricultural subsidies and other agricultural programs
The False Claims Act also applies to any fraudulent misrepresentation or scheme to obtain agricultural subsidies or funds from other agricultural programs.

A major U.S. grain company paid $25 million to resolve a False Claims Act case that involved sales of agricultural products to Iraq through a foreign company participating in a Department of Agriculture program for exporters of agricultural products.

Top of page

Municipal bonds ("yield-burning")
In the municipal bond market, some investment banking firms engage in fraudulent schemes known as "yield-burning," where they charge excessive prices for U.S. Treasury securities sold to municipalities in connection with certain types of tax-exempt bond refinancings.

These refinancing transactions -- known as "advance refundings"-- permit municipalities to refinance their debt at lower interest rates when interest rates decline, and therefore lower their borrowing costs.

Yield-burning occurs when a securities dealer purposely overcharges municipalities for Treasury securities needed for the refinancing. The excessive prices artificially reduce the overall yield on those securities. This practice is illegal because, by law, investments purchased with the proceeds of tax-exempt advance refunding bonds may not have higher aggregate yields than the yield earned on the tax-exempt bonds. Any excess yield must be paid to the U.S. Treasury. Reducing yield by overcharging is not a legitimate method of complying with the yield limitations.

In the first settlement of a False Claims Act case of this kind, CoreStates Financial Corp. paid $3.4 million to the federal government to settle a qui tam case that said its brokerage arm for municipal bonds had engaged in yield-burning.

Top of page